DeCinzo Right On - A Letter to the Editor from Karen Minkowski published in Metro Santa Cruz on May 2nd, 2012.
KAREN MINKOWSKI
In disparaging DeCinzo’s cartoon that depicts the city bulldozing “science-based evidence” and “democracy” (among other things), Charlotte Webster (“Cartoon Facts,” Posts, April 25) omits some critical points about the desal issue.
Many scientifically supported solutions to our water problem have been proposed, but the city, in its years-long, $12 million (to date) push for a desal plant, has refused to commit any reasonable sum of money to investigate these.
The most feasible alternative—that of improved winter water storage (it’s like money in the bank!)—requires a political commitment to cooperation among the three affected water districts. Storage would cost far less and be less environmentally destructive than desal. Nor would storage alter the character of our Westside neighborhoods, as would a desal plant with all its associated infrastructure.
Desal, on the other hand, requires no political will, only an obscene amount of money in this fragile economy: $180 million, including financing.
The cartoon’s portrayal of the city council destroying democracy is right on the mark. While the council approved an ordinance to put desal on the ballot (after the Right-to-Vote-on-Desal began its campaign for a charter amendment), how democratic is it if the powers-that-be have the legal right to withdraw the ordinance before it’s voted on?
In contrast, the petition currently being circulated in the city by Right-To-Vote-on-Desal puts the decision inalienably in the voters’ hands. Please check RTVOD.org or call 419-6441 to find out where to sign this petition.
Karen Minkowski
Santa Cruz
Putting desalination into perspective – A Letter to the Editor from Jerry Paul published in the Santa Cruz Sentinel on May 6th, 2012.
JERRY PAUL
The Santa Cruz City Council’s intention to ensure ample water is much appreciated.
However, engineers have identified options trouncing desalination: less expensive, more energy-efficient, triple lifetimes, keeping lots more money circulating locally.
The facts below show there’s far more water than we need; our actual water problem is the lack of infrastructure to store enough winter river water — our major source — to boost the health of our fish populations and aquifers, while seeing us comfortably through summers and occasional droughts.
Let’s simply call the proposed desal plant’s annual capacity “one desal,” or 2,790 acre-feet. The San Lorenzo River’s average yearly output is 34 desals. Including nearby streams we average 44 desals — 44 times the desalination plant capacity!
Net water use upstream is negligible because septic and irrigation systems eventually return water underground to the rivers. The Santa Cruz Water Department diverts only four desals for human use. So 90 percent of our 44 desals escape us.
Click here to see the rest of Jerry Paul's Letter to the Editor